Modifikasi Strategi KWL (Know, Want to Know, and Learned) dan Implementasinya dalam Pembelajaran Membaca Pemahaman

SPESIFIKASI BUKU

Harga                    : Rp 65.000

Ukuran                  : 14,8 cm x 21 cm 

Jumlah Halaman : 112 hal

Ketebalan Buku  : 1 cm

ISBN                       : On Proses

Deskripsi              : Kemampuan membaca pemahaman merupakan salah satu keterampilan penting dalam proses pembelajaran. Membaca pemahaman tidak hanya menuntut peserta didik untuk menemukan informasi dalam teks, tetapi juga memahami, menginterpretasi, mengevaluasi, dan menghubungkan informasi dengan pengetahuan yang telah dimiliki. Dalam proses tersebut, keterampilan metakognitif dan berpikir kritis memiliki peran penting karena peserta didik perlu menyadari proses berpikirnya, memantau pemahamannya, serta mampu menilai dan mempertanyakan informasi yang diperoleh dari teks. Buku ini membahas modifikasi strategi KWL (Know, Want to Know, and Learned) sebagai salah satu strategi pembelajaran yang dapat mendukung pengembangan kemampuan membaca pemahaman sekaligus keterampilan metakognitif dan berpikir kritis peserta didik. Melalui tahapan Know, Want to Know, dan Learned, peserta didik diarahkan untuk mengaktifkan pengetahuan awal, menetapkan tujuan membaca, memantau proses pemahaman, serta merefleksikan pengetahuan yang diperoleh setelah membaca.

REFERENSI :

Ahmed, R. M. (2020). Investigating EFL learners’ awareness of cognitive and metacognitive reading strategies of students in different disciplines. Arab World English Journal, 11(3), 294–304. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no3.18

Al Adwani, A., Al Fadley, A., Al Gasab, M., & Al Nwaiem, A. F. (2022). The effect of using KWL (Know–Want–Learned) strategy on reading comprehension of 5th grade EFL students in Kuwait. English Language Teaching, 15(1), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v15n1p79

Al Kayed, M., Samardali, M., Essa, L. B., & Johnson, R. (2022). The effects of shadow-reading on EFL learners’ reading comprehension. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 13(5), 1133–1138. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1305.28

Allen, J. (2004). Tools for teaching content literacy. Stenhouse Publishers.

Alshaikh, N. A. A. (2023). The impact of KWL Plus strategy on the development of perceived self-efficacy among students in the Biology Department at Prince Sattam bin Abdul-Aziz University (PSAU), Al-Kharj Governorate. The International Journal of Pedagogy and Curriculum, 30(1). https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-7963/CGP

Al-Zyout, R. B., & Al-Jamal, D. A. (2023). Using “Predict, Organize, Search, Summarize, and Evaluate” strategy in improving students’ reading comprehension. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 13(11), 2789–2799. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1311.08

Barrett, T. C. (1968). Taxonomy of cognitive and affective dimensions of reading comprehension. In H. M. Robinson (Ed.), Innovation and change in reading instruction (pp. 19–23). University of Chicago Press.

Bryan, J. (1998). K-W-W-L: Questioning the known. The Reading Teacher, 51, 618–620.

Carr, E., & Ogle, D. S. (1987). K-W-L Plus: A strategy for comprehension and summarization. Journal of Reading, 30(7), 626–631.

Cerdán, R., Máñez, I., & Serrano-Mendizábal, M. (2021). Reading from multiple documents: The role of text availability and question type. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(S1), S209–S220. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.380

Chun, S. E., & Jung, O. (2023). The effect of question generation-based reading instruction on middle school students’ metacognition and reading comprehension. Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction Research, 23(13), 609–620.

Denton, C. A., Hall, C., Cho, E., Cannon, G., Scammacca, N., & Wanzek, J. (2022). A meta-analysis of the effects of foundational skills and multicomponent reading interventions on reading comprehension for primary-grade students. Learning and Individual Differences, 93, 102062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102062

Dey, M. (2021). Psychological processes in language learning and teaching: Scoping review and future research directions. Journal of Psychological Perspective, 3(2), 105–110. https://doi.org/10.47679/jopp.321532021

Dixon, C., Oxley, E., Gellert, A. S., & Nash, H. (2023). Dynamic assessment as a predictor of reading development: A systematic review. Reading and Writing, 36, 673–698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-022-10312-3

Dolean, D. D., Lervåg, A., Visu-Petra, L., & Melby-Lervåg, M. (2021). Language skills, and not executive functions, predict the development of reading comprehension of early readers: Evidence from an orthographically transparent language. Reading and Writing, 34, 1491–1512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10107-4

Elgort, I., Van de Wetering, R., Ross, A., & Beyersmann, E. (2024). Previewing novel words before reading affects their processing during reading: An eye-movement study with first and second language readers. Language Learning, 74(1), 78–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12579

Ghimire, N., & Mokhtari, K. (2025). Evaluating the predictive power of metacognitive reading strategies across diverse educational contexts. Large-scale Assessments in Education, 13, 4.

Goodman, K. (1970). Reading: Process and program. National Council of Teachers of English.

Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258600700104

Gluck, M. A., & Rumelhart, D. E. (Eds.). (1990). Neuroscience and connectionist theory. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203762981

Hashemi, M., & Karimkhanlooie, G. (2016). The impact of content-based pre-reading activities on Iranian high school EFL learners’ reading comprehension. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 7(1), 137–145. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0701.15

Hessel, A. K., & Schroeder, S. (2022). Word processing difficulty and executive control interactively shape comprehension monitoring in a second language: An eye-tracking study. Reading and Writing, 35, 2287–2312.

Khellab, F., Demirel, Ö., & Mohammadzadeh, B. (2022). Effect of teaching metacognitive reading strategies on reading comprehension of engineering students. SAGE Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221138069

Leonet, O., Arocena, E., & Saragueta, E. (2024/2025). Young bilingual students’ use of metacognitive strategies to overcome comprehension difficulties when reading in the foreign language. Literacy, 59(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12383

Lin, J. (2019). Factors related to EFL/ESL learners’ reading strategy use: A literature review. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 42(1), 92–112. https://doi.org/10.1515/CJAL-2019-0006

McMaster, K. L., & Kendeou, P. (2023). Refocusing reading comprehension: Aligning theory with assessment and intervention. Learning and Individual Differences, 102, 102256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102256

Medina, A. L., Hancock, S. D., Hathaway, J. I., Pilonieta, P., & Holshouser, K. O. (2021). The influence of sustained, school-based professional development on explicit reading comprehension strategy instruction. Reading Psychology, 42(8), 807–835. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2021.1939820

Melvin, M. P. (1979). Psycholinguistics and the teaching of reading. The Elementary School Journal, 79(5), 276–283. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1001494

Moore, D., Alvermann, D., & Hinchman, K. (2000). Struggling adolescent readers: A collection of teaching strategies. International Reading Association.

Nation, K. (2019). Children’s reading difficulties, language, and reflections on the simple view of reading. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 24(1), 47–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404158.2019.1609272

Nurwahidah, Sulfasyah, & Rukli. (2023). Investigating Grade Five teachers’ integration of technology in teaching reading comprehension using the TPACK framework. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 14(4), 927–932. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1404.09

Ogle, D. (1986). K-W-L: A teaching model that develops active reading of expository text. The Reading Teacher, 39, 564–570.

Pahrizal, N., Vintoni, A., Sotlikova, R., & Ya’akub, H. Z. H. (2025). Metacognitive reading strategies and their impact on comprehension: Insights from rural EFL learners. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), 7(1), 18–36. https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v7i1.23908

Rahmasari, B. S., Munir, A., & Nugroho, H. A. (2024). The role of peer tutoring integrated with KWL charts in the development of students’ inferential skills. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2335810

Reid, J., Forrestal, P., & Cook, J. (1989). Small group learning in the classroom. Heinemann.

Ruddell, R. B. (1978). Developing comprehensive abilities: Implications from research for an instructional framework. Educational Perspectives, 17(1), 8–13.