Critical Discourse Analysis In Educational Context Theory, Frameworks, And Applications In Language Education

SPESIFIKASI BUKU

◉ Harga                    : ^Rp 185.000

◉ Ukuran                  : 18 cm x 25 cm 

◉ Jumlah Halaman : 417 hal

◉ Ketebalan Buku  : 1  cm

◉ ISBN                       : On Proses

◉ Deskripsi Buku   : This monograph, Critical Discourse Analysis in Educational Context: Theory, Frameworks, and Applications in Language Education, is designed for lecturers, researchers, postgraduate students, teachers, and educational practitioners who seek a systematic account of how discourse participates in the construction of knowledge, authority, identity, and inequality. It brings foundational concepts of Critical Discourse Analysis into sustained dialogue with educational policy, curriculum, EFL textbooks, research design, and classroom interaction. The revised edition strengthens the conceptual progression of the book and clarifies the relationship between linguistic evidence and critical social explanation. Citation practices have been standardized in accordance with the seventh edition of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association. Narrative, parenthetical, and integrated citations are used purposefully to distinguish the author’s analytical voice from the contributions of the scholars whose work underpins the discussion. The present revision also integrates the authors’ published empirical studies as contextual examples across chapters on power, evaluation, research design, policy, and classroom interaction. Each chapter now concludes with an integrative synthesis and two original visual models. These figures are not decorative summaries; they make explicit the analytical architecture, inferential sequence, and methodological decisions required for defensible CDA. The chapter on linguistic resources has also been revised to include social actor representation and agency, thereby eliminating repetition and strengthening the connection among grammar, representation, multimodality, and institutional responsibility. The monograph maintains the principle that Critical Discourse Analysis is not a single mechanical method. It is a problem-oriented, interdisciplinary research tradition that requires close attention to text and talk, careful contextualization, theoretical transparency, reflexivity, and ethical responsibility. Readers are therefore encouraged to adapt the frameworks presented here to their research questions while preserving a clear evidential chain from semiotic form to discursive function and social explanation.

REFERENSI :

Abid, A. (2026). The representation of environmental issues in the Super Minds textbooks: A critical micro-semiotic discourse analysis. Australian Journal of Environmental Education. https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2026.10173

Agni, Z. A., Setyaningsih, E., & Sarosa, T. (2020). Examining gender representation in an Indonesian EFL textbook. Register Journal, 13(1), 183–207. https://doi.org/10.18326/rgt.v13i1.183-207

Aguilar-Forero, N., & Salazar, F. (2025). Critical/decolonial global citizenship education and libraries from the Global South. Prospects, 55, 105–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-023-09655-8

Aline, D., & Hosoda, Y. (2024). Layers of oriented-to identities in language learner peer discussion tasks. TESOL Quarterly, 58(4), 1703–1733. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3303

Andersson, C., & Palm, T. (2020). Formative assessment as a collaborative act: Teachers' intentions and students' experiences. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 68, Article 100963.

Annamalai, N., Zakarneh, B., Kabilan, M. K., & Karmina, S. (2025). An integration of the Sustainable Development Goals in educational textbooks: The case of Malaysian high-school English textbooks. World Journal of English Language, 15(8), 137–151. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v15n8p137

Apple, M. W. (2004). Ideology and curriculum (3rd ed.). RoutledgeFalmer.

Argawati, N. O., Musthafa, B., & Gustine, G. G. (2025). Self-evaluation of teacher talk (SETT): Facilitating teacher-students interaction in EFL speaking class. Indonesian EFL Journal, 11(2).

Bacchi, C. (2009). Analysing policy: What's the problem represented to be? Pearson Australia.

Badem-Korkmaz, F., & Balaman, U. (2024). Eliciting student participation in video-mediated EFL classroom interactions: Focus on teacher response-pursuit practices. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(7), 1881–1903. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2127772

Baker, P. (2006). Using corpora in discourse analysis. Continuum.

Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., Khosravinik, M., Krzyżanowski, M., McEnery, T., & Wodak, R. (2008). A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse & Society, 19(3), 273–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508088962

Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays (M. Holquist, Ed.; C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). University of Texas Press.

Balaman, U. (2025). A longitudinal case study of L2 interactional competence development in the ELT classroom: Teachability and learnability of L2 interactional practices. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 35(4), 2237–2247.

Ball, S. J. (1993). What is policy? Texts, trajectories and toolboxes. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 13(2), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/0159630930130203

Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher's soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268093022000043065

Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2012). How schools do policy: Policy enactments in secondary schools. Routledge.

Barbour, R. (2018). Doing focus groups (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Anchor Books.

Berger, R. (2015). Now I see it, now I don't: Researcher's position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 15(2), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112468475

Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique (Rev. ed.). Rowman & Littlefield.

Bhaskar, R. (1975). A realist theory of science. Leeds Books.

Boonsuk, Y., Baker, W., Alhasnawi, S., Álvarez Valencia, J. A., Miranda, N., & Ngo, P. L. H. (2026). English and global citizenship education: A critical examination of multilingual classrooms in the Global South. Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amag011

Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Harvard University Press.

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Braun, A., Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., & Hoskins, K. (2011). Taking context seriously: Towards explaining policy enactments in the secondary school. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 32(4), 585–596. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2011.601555

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications.

Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2015). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

British Educational Research Association. (2018). Ethical guidelines for educational research (4th ed.).

Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge University Press.

Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Multilingual Matters.

Canagarajah, A. S. (2013). Translingual practice: Global Englishes and cosmopolitan relations. Routledge.

Canale, G., & Furtado, V. (2021). Gender in EFL education: Negotiating textbook discourse in the classroom. Changing English, 28(1), 58–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/1358684X.2020.1812377

Caravaca, R. V. (2019). Effective questioning in CLIL classrooms: Empowering thinking. ELT Journal, 73(4), 367–376.

Carroll, S. M. (2024). Anti-oppressive global citizenship education in English-language teaching: A three-pillar approach. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 37(6), 1772–1787. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2023.2233912

Cazden, C. B. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Heinemann.

Chan, B. H.-S., & Chou, C. I.-P. (2022). Translanguaging practices of Macau junior-one students in a remedial class. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 7, Article 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-022-00164-3

Chang, C. (2021). Effects of an instant response system integrated learning activity on EFL students' learning achievement and perceptions. System, 103, Article 102637.

Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. Palgrave Macmillan.

Cheung, A. (2021). Synchronous online teaching, a blessing or a curse? Insights from EFL primary students' interaction during online English lessons. System, 100, Article 102566.

Cheung, K. K. C., Pun, J. K. H., & Xu, J. (2025). Development of a questionnaire on multilingual students' beliefs about equitable and epistemic use of languages in learning science. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 23, 2919–2950.

Chichon, J. (2019). Factors influencing overseas learners' willingness to communicate on a pre-sessional programme at a UK university. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 39, 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.04.002

Chouliaraki, L., & Fairclough, N. (1999). Discourse in late modernity: Rethinking critical discourse analysis. Edinburgh University Press.

(Daftar masih berlanjut karena jumlah referensi melebihi kapasitas satu respons ChatGPT.)