Evaluasi Sistem Informasi: Dari Teori Ke Bukti Seni Dan Ilmu Evaluasi Dengan Sem-pls Dan Smartpls

SPESIFIKASI BUKU

Harga                    : Rp 85.000

Ukuran                  : 14,8 cm x 21 cm 

Jumlah Halaman : 193 hal

Ketebalan Buku  : 1  cm

ISBN                       : On Proses

Deskripsi Buku   : Senja di Kuala Lumpur, 2019. Seorang mahasiswa S3 kebingungan menatap output SmartPLS. Ia sudah membaca buku SEM dan mengikuti berbagai tutorial, tetapi tetap merasa ada jurang antara teori dan data nyata. Di meja sebelah, seorang praktisi IT juga mengeluhkan hal serupa: butuh panduan berbasis data, bukan sekadar intuisi. Dari kegelisahan itulah buku ini lahir—sebagai jembatan antara rigor akademik dan kebutuhan praktis. Selama dua puluh tahun sebagai akademisi dan konsultan, saya melihat banyak orang menggunakan SmartPLS sebagai black box atau justru terjebak dalam detail teknis tanpa memahami gambaran besar. Buku ini hadir dengan pendekatan berbeda: dimulai dari cerita nyata, mengintegrasikan teori evaluasi sistem informasi (TAM, TOE, HotFit, ISSM, TTF), metodologi kuantitatif, dan aplikasi SEM-PLS secara utuh. Studi kasusnya berbasis pengalaman organisasi di Indonesia, bukan contoh fiktif. Fokusnya bukan hanya “bagaimana”, tetapi juga “mengapa”. Ditujukan untuk mahasiswa, peneliti, dosen, dan praktisi, buku ini menjadi panduan konseptual sekaligus aplikatif dalam mengevaluasi sistem informasi secara berbasis bukti.

REFERENSI :

Alley, M. (2013). The craft of scientific presentations: Critical steps to succeed and critical errors to avoid (2nd ed.). Springer.

Alter, S. (2013). Work system theory: Overview of core concepts, extensions, and challenges for the future. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 14(2), 72–121.

American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct.

Ash, J. S., Sittig, D. F., Poon, E. G., Guappone, K., Campbell, E., & Dykstra, R. H. (2007). The extent and importance of unintended consequences related to computerized provider order entry. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 14(4), 415–423.

Barclay, D., Higgins, C., & Thompson, R. (1995). The partial least squares (PLS) approach to causal modeling: Personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technology Studies, 2(2), 285–309.

Berg, M. (1999). Patient care information systems and health care work: A sociotechnical approach. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 55(2), 87–101.

Callegaro, M., Baker, R. P., Bethlehem, J., Göritz, A. S., Krosnick, J. A., & Lavrakas, P. J. (Eds.). (2015). Online panel research: A data quality perspective. Wiley.

Campbell, J. (1949). The hero with a thousand faces. Pantheon Books.

Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–336). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Churchill, G. A. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64–73.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Coltman, T., Devinney, T. M., Midgley, D. F., & Venaik, S. (2008). Formative versus reflective measurement models: Two applications of formative measurement. Journal of Business Research, 61(12), 1250–1262.

Cresswell, K., & Sheikh, A. (2013). Organizational issues in the implementation and adoption of health information technology innovations: An interpretative review. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 82(5), e73–e86.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.

Dawes, J. (2008). Do data characteristics change according to the number of scale points used? International Journal of Market Research, 50(1), 61–77.

Day, R. A., & Gastel, B. (2012). How to write and publish a scientific paper (7th ed.). Greenwood.

DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30.

DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (4th ed.). Wiley.

European Federation of Psychologists' Associations. (2005). Meta-Code of Ethics.

Few, S. (2012). Show me the numbers: Designing tables and graphs to enlighten (2nd ed.). Analytics Press.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105.

Goodman, L. A. (1961). Snowball sampling. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 32(1), 148–170.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.